TMLA International Digital Scientific Congress maintains rigorous academic standards through a structured, transparent review process that ensures the quality and integrity of all scientific presentations.
Step-by-Step Workflow
From submission to certification — a transparent, structured process ensuring scientific excellence at every stage.
Authors submit their structured scientific abstract through our secure online portal. Submissions include Background, Aim, Methods, Results, Conclusion, and Keywords following international academic standards.
All submissions undergo an initial administrative screening to verify completeness, formatting compliance, and adherence to submission guidelines before entering the scientific review phase.
Qualified reviewers evaluate the scientific merit of each submission based on established criteria including methodology, originality, clinical relevance, and contribution to healthcare knowledge.
Each submission is assessed for ethical compliance, originality, and adherence to responsible research conduct standards. This includes verification of ethical approvals and plagiarism screening.
Based on the comprehensive review, a final decision is communicated to authors. Decisions include acceptance, revision required, or rejection — each accompanied by constructive feedback.
Accepted authors prepare their final poster or presentation materials following TMLA guidelines. Templates and support resources are provided to ensure professional quality output.
Upon successful presentation at the congress, presenters receive a verified certificate of presentation.
Assessment Framework
All submissions are evaluated against five core criteria, each weighted to reflect its importance in determining scientific quality and clinical impact.
Methodology, study design, and analytical approach are evaluated for scientific soundness and reproducibility.
Contribution of new knowledge, novel approaches, or innovative applications to healthcare practice.
Potential impact on patient care, healthcare delivery, or clinical decision-making.
Clarity of writing, logical structure, appropriate use of data, and adherence to academic standards.
Adherence to research ethics, patient consent, data protection, and responsible conduct of research.
Note: The weighting system serves as a guideline for reviewers. Final decisions consider the holistic quality of the submission and its potential contribution to healthcare knowledge. Submissions demonstrating exceptional merit in any single criterion may receive favorable consideration.
Research Ethics
TMLA is committed to upholding the highest standards of research ethics and responsible scientific conduct, aligned with international guidelines and best practices.
Transparency Statement
In alignment with evolving academic standards, TMLA maintains clear policies regarding the use of artificial intelligence tools in scientific submissions and the review process.
TMLA acknowledges that AI tools are increasingly used in academic research. We require full transparency regarding their use in submitted work.
Academic Integrity
TMLA maintains a zero-tolerance policy towards plagiarism and academic misconduct. All submissions are subject to originality verification.
Plagiarism in any form — including text, data, figures, or ideas — is a serious violation of academic integrity. TMLA employs multiple measures to detect and prevent plagiarism in all submissions.
Self-plagiarism: Authors should note that submitting substantially similar work that has been previously published or presented elsewhere without proper disclosure is also considered a form of plagiarism. Authors must declare any prior presentations or publications of the same work.
Review Governance
The integrity of our review process depends on maintaining strict confidentiality at every stage. Both reviewers and authors are protected by our confidentiality framework.
Our review process operates under strict confidentiality protocols to ensure fairness, prevent bias, and protect intellectual property.
Join healthcare professionals worldwide in contributing to global medical knowledge. Our transparent review process ensures your work receives fair, constructive evaluation.